The First Jewish Lie: The Old Testament fabrication that the Israelites were slaves in Egypt

It seems that Jews have lied about their history in the Old Testament. Overwhelming new evidence by top Egyptian and Israeli scholars shows that Jews were never slaves in Egypt. 

If the Jews had been living in Egypt for centuries as slaves,
surely they would have noticed the pyramids and the Sphinx?
Strangely, neither of these great architectural wonders of the world
are mentioned even once in the Old Testament!

Jews lie. Jews have always lied. And most assuredly, Jews are still lying today about everything that has to do with themselves and their sordid history.

So considering how they have wrecked the United States, Russia, Germany and so many other countries by mentally lobotomizing and financially castrating all of them, it should come as no surprise that Jews have falsified their own history from the very beginning.

Or to put it more concisely in the words of an Egyptian medical doctor named Ashraf Ezzat:

“The truth is that ancient Egypt never knew any Pharaohs nor any Israelites. Egypt was never the land of Exodus and Palestine was never the Promised Land.”

Backed by every reputable expert in the known world, Ezzat argues that ancient Hebrew history as we know it today is based on one colossal lie — that events described as happening in Egypt, if they happened at all, really happened in Arabia. Which means that according to his version, the tales of Joseph, Moses and the Exodus might still be true, but the location in which they are alleged to have happened are false.

To the average person, this would seem a farfetched assertion were it not for the supportive testimony of the world’s top Egyptologists, from James Henry Breasted to Donald Redford to Israel Finkelstein. Even some Israeli experts agree, including the head of archeology at Tel Aviv University. Prof. Ze’ev Herzog, in a 1999 article in Ha’aretz, said:

“The Israelites were never in Egypt, did not wander in the desert, did not conquer the land in a military campaign and did not pass it on to the 12 tribes of Israel.”

5-cthe-crossing-of-the-red-sea-rosselli

The Crossing of the Red Sea ROSSELLI (1439 – 1507)

[LD: The Old Testament tells us that God helped to part the waves of the Red Sea, allowing his Chosen People to cross over miraculously to the other side as they fled from Pharaoh’s pursuing army. As soon as the Egyptian army descended into the same trench, God let the waves return in a huge collapsing wall onto the heads of the evil Egyptians who were all drowned. 

Amusing titbit. “Red Sea pedestrians”  =  Monty Python’s politically incorrect euphemism for “Jews”. [LD]

§

Needless to say, this revelation has profound implications for all of the world’s major monotheistic religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam, which all base their deeply flawed legitimacy on these questionable Old Testament legends.

For Dr. Ezzat, the ferreting out of the real story of the Jews is a matter of defending the reputation of his illustrious homeland, the oldest known human civilization, the mysterious land of the pyramids and the Sphinx. Ezzat seeks merely to uncover the truth buried beneath two thousand years of deliberate and slanderous misrepresentation of a culture that provided the foundation of the monotheistic religions which have “borrowed” heavily from Egyptian tradition but neglected to mention the source as they claimed these well-known rituals as their own.
Ezzat has labored at this task for several years on his Pyramidion website, but now has taken a big step forward with the publication of “Egypt Knew No Pharaohs Nor Israelites” (pictured). The book is available in a Kindle edition for a mere $5 and contains lots of very valuable live links, including Breasted’s famous “Dawn of Conscience” essay and instructive background material from the Roman writer Plutarch, Egyptologist Donald Redford and contemporary reporter Juan Cole using archivist Peter Myers’ encyclopedic background data.

The book is a real treasure trove of objective Biblical history, an essential counterweight to the overabundance of unreliable religious proselytization material that handicaps objective historical scholars everywhere with self-absorbed misinformation.

Defending Egypt’s honorable tradition

Many factors set Ezzat on this detective trail of the Biblical deception that castigates Ancient Egypt as an immoral, slave-keeping society.

The first clue was that the Old Testament never mentioned the pyramids, making the writers of that document the first and probably the only visitors to Egypt who never mentioned these awe-inspiring structures.

Ezzat’s contention, backed by solid empirical scholarship, is that the events of the Old Testament occurred in southwestern Arabia, in a province called Mizraim, or Misr, a location now near modern day Yemen, which is where he says the tribe of Israel was really born.

The second tipoff was the terrain, which in the OT more resembles hilly Arabia rather than flat Egypt. Also, the Bible recounts droughts, which Egypt never had, only fluctuations in the flooding of the Nile. Many of the events ascribed to the area of present day Palestine actually occurred much further south down the coast of the Red Sea, Ezzat insists. Furthermore an even more telling detail in the Joseph story was the camel caravan carrying “gum, balm and myrrh”, which were products of Arabian trade, not Egypt’s.

The third and most revealing clue was the notion of slavery, which Ezzat claims was never practiced in Egypt until the Greeks and Persians brought the practice with them a thousand years later than the supposed time of Moses and Joseph.

Some stories state the pyramids were built by slaves, but history shows us the pyramid builders were willing volunteers, as the village of the pyramid builders attests.

And the fourth aspect of this millennia-old Old Testament fraud was the label of pharaoh, which no Egyptian document ever uses. But the leader of the Mizraim tribe was called Faraon, which made the switch from Hebrew to Greek and the creation of a villainous pharaoh many centuries later an easy trick to pull off. Egypt, one of the best documented of all ancient civilizations, never once used the term pharaoh.

This is truly a tale of two Egypts: Egypt was mentioned in the Bible around 700 times; the Israelites were not mentioned once in the Egyptian records.

The 5th century BC historian Herodotus, commonly known as “the father of history”, never mentioned pharaohs, only kings. Herodotus also never mentioned Israel, repeatedly mentioned Palestine, Syria and the Phoenicians, never mentioned Jews or Canaanites, and never mentioned any Jewish holy temple.

But more than anything else, it was the insult to Ancient Egypt’s extremely enlightened religious philosophy — moral practices that have never been equalled by the civilizations that came later — that compelled Ezzat to defend the honor of a remarkable culture that survived for the better part of three millennia, longer – you make take note — than any other culture in world history.

“Deceitfully linking the story of Moses and his Pharaoh has tarnished the image of one of humanity’s greatest civilizations,” Ezzat writes. “Ancient Egypt has been stabbed in the heart by this two-thousand year duplicity. And this deception is likely to continue if we don’t expose the truth about the Israelite stories and their Arabic origin and the Septuagint fraud.”

Corrupt Jewish translators

In the 2nd century BC, the Hebrew bible was translated from Aramaic to Greek at the legendary Library of Alexandria. Seventy Jewish scribes, hence the designation of the Septuagint Bible, were assigned this task by the Ptolemies in which they cunningly replaced this obscure tribal leader Faraon with the mighty Egypt and its king. The Greek version, with this malicious distortion of ancient history, has been the source for all translations of the Bible worldwide ever since.

The Septaguint deception had been the result of a Greek-Jewish bond very similar to nowadays’ American-Israeli one. (Controlling and manipulating world superpowers — ancient and modern — is obviously an old Jewish proficiency also demonstrable in the old Jewish/Persian arrangement that led to the release from Babylonian Captivity and the complicity with the Roman Empire to control and contain Christianity.)

Replacing the Arabic town of Mizraim/Misr with pharaonic Egypt in the stories of the Patriarchs has not only distorted the Israelite stories but the historiography of the whole ancient Near East.

The dangers this misrepresentation presents to modern times are numerous.

Number one, modern Egyptians have been detached from their own culture.

Number two, the lies presented in the Bible that have filtered into other religions present a violent danger based on mistaken information.

For instance, the Salafis, hardened Islamists and jihadists, want to demolish all of ancient Egypt’s monument and temples, including the Pyramids and the Sphinx, because they believe these are the idols Pharaoh worshipped while rejecting the true word of God delivered by Moses.

So here is a closed-minded mass murder plot based on the fairy tale of Jewish slaves building the Pyramids

The Exodus tale is about slaves, toiling in 400 years of continuous bondage. The failure of his brothers to murder Joseph is told both in the Qu’ran and the Bible. The brothers sold him to the Ishmaelites, not the Egyptians, for 20 shekels of silver (Genesis 37:26-28).

The Septaguint deception repeated through contemporary filmmaking was evident in the recent Ridley Scott film (which flopped at the box office!) Exodus: Gods and Kings.

Egypt banned this movie for its “Zionist view of history”. The same scam perpetrated by the Jews for 3000 years — changing history to dupe the public — is still being run today in Hollywood.

Although Exodus: Gods and Kings is set in Egypt, you won’t actually be able to see it there. According to Deadline magazine (and reported by Ezzat), Scott’s adaptation of the biblical story of Moses has run afoul of Egyptian censors. Abdul Sattar Fathi, the head of the Egyptian state censorship board, harshly criticized the film, citing “historical mistakes” such as claiming the Jews built the pyramids and portraying Moses as a general, not a prophet.

“Furthermore,” Fathi said, “it shows ancient Egyptians as a mob group persecuting peaceful Jews. Our board has refused this out of respect for Egyptians’ feelings.”

(Peaceful Jews, I like that. Could be the only example in history of peaceful Jews. No surprise that only Hollywood could come with a concept like peaceful Jews, which is surely a type of human being that has never before been seen in history. Go tell the Palestinians about peaceful Jews.)

Says Ezzat, who remains scrupulously impartial when it comes to contemporary politics, Egypt is simply not where this story took place.

At the time, Israel wasn’t there

Jews lie. How many modern examples do you need? Six million dead in a Holocaust that never happened? People all over the world paying reparations for crimes they didn’t commit and being thrown in jail when they ask for proof of these crimes. A Jewish company producing poison food and a Jewish government forcing people to eat it. Jews murdering thousands of unarmed peasants and calling it self defense, triggering wars all over the world through covert manipulation of governments it has bought.

Current Israeli rabble rouser Binyamin Netanyahu said recently in a speech that the Jewish people were building Jerusalem 3000 years ago. Yet another Jewish lie.

Ezzat says no.

“The Jewish people were not building Jerusalem 3000 years ago, i.e. 1000 BC . . . There was no invasion of geographical Palestine from Egypt by former slaves in the 2200s BCE . . . The chronicle of events of the reign of Ramses II on the wall in Luxor does not know about any major slave results or flights by same into the Sinai peninsula. Egyptian sources never heard of Moses or the 12 plagues.”

Jerusalem not only was not being built by the likely then non-existent “Jewish people” in 1000 BCE, but Jerusalem probably was not even inhabited at that point in history. Jerusalem appears to have been abandoned between 1000 BCE and 900 BCE, the traditional dates for the united kingdom under David and Solomon.

So Jerusalem was not ‘the city of David,’ since there was no city there when he is said to have lived there. No sign of magnificent palaces or great states has been found in the archeology of this period, and the Assyrian tablets, which recorded even minor events throughout the Middle East, such as the actions of Arab queens, don’t know anything about any great kingdom of David and Solomon in geographical Palestine.

Not a thing.

Palestine was not the homeland for the kingdom of Israel and the stories of its early patriarchs. The inception of Judaism and the stories of Abraham, Isaac, Joseph and Moses happened in Arabia and Yemen, Ezzat writes. The blatant failure of Biblical archeology in the land of Palestine is primarily due to a premise completely flawed and a Bible (Septaguint) cunningly tampered with (by the same evil creeps who manipulate our news and educational materials today).

Egypt’s written records date back to 1870 BC. No trace of the Israelites.

Slavery was a common tradition in Arabia but not in Egypt. Slavery didn’t come to Egypt “until 7th to 4th century BC, with the influence of the Persian/Greek invasions.”

This tradition of slavery lingers on in Yemen, where foreigners aren’t allowed to get a job without the sponsorship of a native called a kafeel who control all aspects of their lives.

In his breakthrough theory “Bible Came from Arabia” Dr. Kamal Salibi has discovered more than one hundred place names in Arabia and North Yemen that amazingly matched the ones mentioned in the Torah, Ezzat writes.

“Placing the Israelites back in their native Arabic land will no longer make the pervasive future of slavery in the stories of Joseph and Moses alien or inexplicable, or the walls and fortifications of mountainous villages tumbled by Joshua unreal and unverifiable.

“The land Joshua conquered was a small territory in North Yemen. The Egypt of the Bible is not the Egypt of the NIle Valley but an obscure little town in the southwestern desert of ancient Arabia called Mizraim, or Misr in Hebrew and Arabic.

“The Exodus took place in a much humbler way and on a much narrower scale in an obscure little village in ancient South Arabia,” Ezzat writes.

“If Egypt knew no Pharaohs, then it goes without saying that Egypt never knew Moses, either. And if Moses never set foot in Egypt, then the Exodus’ road map into the Promised Land has to be redrawn.”

A conception of world harmony

The lies began a long time ago. According to the Old Testament, written by Jews, ancient Egypt is the land of idolatry, tyranny and slavery.

It is this slander at which Ezzat bristles, because the precepts of the ancient Egyptian religion were plagiarized by its Christian and Muslim successors lock, stock and barrel.

“Maat is the Egyptian concept of world harmony based on justice, balance and truth. Maat, or the lady of truth, as personified by ancient Egyptians in the shape of a lady wearing the feather of truth on her head and holding the balance of justice, is the code of ethics by which all Egyptians, including monarchs, should follow,” Ezzat writes.

The late Prof. Breasted, in a beautiful introduction to his 1933 classic Dawn of Conscience, writes in a live link from the book:

“The Egyptians possessed a standard of morals far superior to that of the Decalogue (the Ten Commandments) over a thousand years before the Decalogue was written.”

n13937c_4

Famous Egyptologist Professor James Henry Breasted
in his office at the Oriental Institute, 1929

So Ezzat is not making this stuff up. Breasted is one of the most respected historians ever. And Ezzat’s insistence that much of the material in the Old Testament is fabricated, distorted and plagiarized is true.

For instance, the wisdom of Amenemope, preserved in an Egyptian papyrus in the British Museum, was translated into Hebrew in ancient times and, circulating in Palestine, was the source for a whole section of the Old Testament Book of Proverbs.

“Our moral heritage derives from a wider human past enormously older than the Hebrews, and it has come to us rather through the Hebrews than from them. Man arose to high moral vision two thousand years before the Hebrew nation was born,” Ezzat writes.

Just like in modern times, when in World War II Germany was presented as the bad guy while the Jewish countries the U.S., Britain and Soviet Union were presented as the good guys, the Hebrews presented Israelite interlopers as the brave heroes and innocent Egyptians as the villains, which like the juxtaposition of Israeli murderers and Palestinian victims into Jew freedom fighters and Islamic terrorists is a historical injustice and unforgivable lie of the type that so debilitates our existence today.

Jews lie. They always have, and they always will.

source

27 thoughts on “The First Jewish Lie: The Old Testament fabrication that the Israelites were slaves in Egypt

  1. Horribly and deeply antisemitic. For example, the Holocaust this article says never happened – – Honestly, the death camps existed. Eisenhower forced the Germans to view them to see what was there. THere are pictures, videos and people who were there. Shame on you – SHAME, SHAME, SHAME!

    1. “Jews lie. Jews have always lied. And most assuredly, Jews are still lying today about everything that has to do with themselves and their sordid history.” That should be enough to say that the author has a virulent anti-Jewish bias.

    2. The ‘ holocaust ‘ was AT BEST a gross exaggeration, at worst a pack of lies. When you study it you soon realize that nothing adds up. Total bollocks.

    3. Agree with you, Daniel! This story is despicable! Why was this written and why is it being shared on the internet?

  2. The Sinai route from Egypt to Palestine has been traveled since the dawn of history and should have been know to jews if they ever were in Egypt. they could easily have escaped on land and didn’t need god to part the red sea

    1. You need to read the account. Geographically, you are mistaken. Read the research on this travel. And by the way, the Bible itself can be proven accurate in a court of law anywhere. What you need to do is try to prove it inaccurate, go ahead, I dare you.

      1. Not quite true Connie – the Bible is no longer used in Courts of Law in New Zealand. However it can be produced if requested by defendants or witnesses. This is now becoming more common throughout the intelligent world. It is however accepted that the Bible is an important historical document for those studying the geographical area of the Bible. It is though now undisputed that this area was only a minute area of the civilized world at the time the Book was written. China’s civilisation for example was hundreds of years ahead of the ‘Biblical’ lands, as were the American Aztecs etc. It is also worth mentioning Northern Europe was densely populated by various peoples – none of whom are mentioned in the Bible. Therefore it is only a pro-Jewish, pro-Christian minority who claim allegiance the then Biblical area, and affiliation to the Bible stories.

  3. I challenge the following statement by the author of this article: “This tradition of slavery lingers on in Yemen, where foreigners aren’t allowed to get a job without the sponsorship of a native called a kafeel who control all aspects of their lives.”

    I visited Yemen twice, living and working there for nine months. I met and worked with several immigrants from Sudan and Somalia and had close friends some of whom were Yemeni’s from poor families. Not one of my acquaintances ever mentioned the existence of slavery in Yemen, and I never observed anyone being treated as a slave. Yemen has been the poorest country in the Middle East, long before the current war and mass starvation, yet the society is very respectful of human rights and remarkably tolerant. It is very different to Saudi Arabia as it has a rich culture and heritage stretching thousands of years into antiquity.

    Furthermore, as a foreigner, I had two Yemeni employers, neither of whom even attempted to control any aspects of my life, apart from arranging the necessary working visas and permits that are normally required for foreigners by most countries I have visited in different parts of the world. I am curious as to what the author is really trying to prove beyond making nationalist claims for Egypt’s historic reputation whilst making these inaccurate statements about other nations and peoples.

  4. Apparently Jesus was wrong and probably never existed if we think the way this article was writen,
    …see Luke 24:44, apparently Jesus believed in the “LAW OF MOSES” and ALL those stories. Amazing how many so called “truthers” have fallen for the Jewish lies to discredit the Bible. Sooooooo many have fallen for it. So WHO are you going to believe people Jesus Christ or fable man? Just sayin…Now, as to the holocaust lies, I totally agree with the writer.I have asked till I’m blue in the face for just ONE proof using forensics and science to prove that anybody was gassed in homicidal gas chambers…I’m still waiting….

    1. I was a child in World War II. Stories of Jews being mistreated, taken to concentration camps, tatooed with numbers…people knew people who knew people who were packed into trains like sardines, it was all very real at the time. Why anyone should doubt it, I don’t know.
      On the other hand, one can see that people want to alter ideas they can’t accept, so perhaps the Bible in the early forming altered the place where it all happened. I could see that as making sense.

      1. Dodo, nobody is doubting that internment camps existed in great numbers, but darling, a number tattooed on you mothers arm does not prove that human gas chambers existed, or that lampshades were made from jewskin. The Holohoax was outed years ago when the Internet kicked in. Nobody accepts this blocks anymore.

        1. To whom it may concern: In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatsoever of ‘Gas Chambers.’ The original 1946 edition did not even talk of ‘extermination’ or death camps’ but after the emotional impact of the Nuremberg trials the Red Cross felt compelled to introduce into the expanded 1948 Report several, very cursory references to ‘death camps’ ‘extermination camp’ ( Vol. l p.645 ) however, no means of ‘extermination’ is indicated. In all its 1,600 pages the three-volume Report does not even mention such a thing as a ‘Gas Chamber’. It acknowledges that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities suffered heavily. “No mentioning of Gas Chamber.” One of the most important aspects of the Report of the ICRC is, that it clarifies the true causes of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps towards the end of the War. ‘Says the Report.’..In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the War, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed on an increased number of victims.

      2. Actually, no. People, today,are trying to alter history; take this article for example. As for the reliability of the Scriptures, that has been proven over and over again. Here are just a couple of online articles for you to read but there are many more detailed books which demonstrate the the Bible\s accuracy based on the Dead Sea Scrolls for instance.

  5. Once we separate the Jews from the Israelites a lot of things become clearer.

  6. There is this book “Initiation” from Elisabeth Heich
    She wrote the book before WW2 describing her spiritual traveling back to her former self into the Ancient Egypt where she also described that in early dynasties of Egypt there was no slavery..

  7. Approximately 3M Jews will have died or been killed in WW2 the majority would have died from Typhus or Starvation not concentration camps. Approximately 1.5M Jews lived in Germany during the war the figure of 6M is greatly exaggerated. David Irving –Author of book ‘Hitler’s War’ he exposed that lie and was jailed.

  8. If pointing to the fact that “Jews are the parasites of the Earth” amounts to anti-semitism, then would calling Osama-bin-laden a terrorist be ‘anti-laden’ism? Calling a spade a spade doesn’t mean anti-this or anti-that, especially when it is corroborated by copious amounts of evidence. It’s just what it is. The jews just need to suck up this fact despite their cognitive dissonance and try to mend their crooked ways. But of course, that’d be just wishful thinking on my part.

  9. History is written by the conquerors, so why blame just the Jews for a misleading history? The Catholic church created the 4 Gospels out of thousands of manuscripts, and there never were 4 writers known as Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, yet no one blames the Christians for lying. Most religions are based on the deception that God exists somewhere outside yourself, and that you need priests to intercede with him for you.

  10. I knew the truth would come out sooner or later. Connie miller I know it to be true. How? When in life news have been peaceful and loving. Never. Yall are manipulators and tapers of nations, and you want someone to feel sorry for people that is right now murdering helpless Palestinians in they own land you stole. Just like your brothers stole America from the natives of America. Evil lives within you. You incite wars in a land you don’t belong. I will share this article all over the world for people to see. More research and and study will be made to bring out More of the truth. This need to be known. If not through the internet then by my word of mouth. May the god of the universe have mirsey on your souls for the lies you have given to the world just to hold power over the real people of the world.

  11. “Wow! The hate of all things Israel, Jewish and Hebrew is highly apparent, my friend but – firstly – you are entitled to our opinion, whilst geographically there was NO Yemen, that is part of what used to be Abyssinia which – if your ratings are taken at face value – didn’t exist…. Mate, there’s so many unmistakable flaws: The Ishmeelites were GOING TO Egypt, obviously to trade, the name – by the way – intimates progeny of Abraham’s first son, Ishmael. So Piankhi, Shabbaka and Tahaqa (Tirhakir in the bible) couldn’t have ruled Egypt, then? As well as decimating Jewish history to oblivion take Ethiopia’s history – The FIRST country spoken of, in the bible – with you. Your hatred is unmistakable but, giving credence to THEIR Septuagint is a terrible mistake, Ethiopian bible records are much older – dare I say more authentic. my gripe with you is, the hatred you emanate because a man of your vehemence will NEVER be able to interpret The Holy Bible; Moses threw down his stick and it became a bigger snake, how are you going to interpret that, not on a literal level, I hope, as you’ve managed to do with everything else……. forgetting the bible is poetically written, requiring skills which, even Ezzat – hope I got that right – doesn’t possess, called inspiration…. Your idols: Maat, Horus and Osiris are all in the bible, with Ashtoreth and Moloch; happy hunting trying to distinguish and determine them. The most heinous and illusionary apparition known to mankind is hatred. When you wake up and realise Ethiopia stretched all the way to India – testified by Tamrin, Makeda’s most eminent ambassador, and written in Psalm 69 – of the bible you hate and denounce so, I suggest you cool down and decipher fact from allegorical Poetry – with Ezzat – and start again, with a bit more respect for other countries and their faiths….. See Senacherib, Assyria, also. JAH. Henry York

Leave a Reply